emacs at work (WinXP) as I do at home on my Mac and Linux machines, and Cocoa Emacs played well with it with minute adjustments, so I went with it.A useful mode in emacs that parallels the feature in Vim is visual line mode which merely presents the text as being line wrapped rather than actually having a line break at a certain point evil-mode is able to utilize visual movements (gj, gk, etc. But that's probably not a problem for you since you're coming from TextMate. emacs file you've built up over the years on other systems. It also tried to save my entire color-theme to custom-set-faces, which is an idiotic thing to do the color-theme takes up 1111 lines in a nice elisp file off on it's own - why try to stuff it in custom-set-faces?Īnyways, just a warning - you may have issues if you try to give Aquamacs a largish. It tries to save a ton of crap to custom-set-variables, including things I set via setq to keep my. Not sure if they're all there, but save, cut, copy, and paste are certainly bound to the proper OS X shortcut.Īs for Aquamacs, I tried it first, but had major issues trying to get it to accept my. Only thing holding me back is the convenience of Cmd+C/X/V.Ĭocoa Emacs /does/ have Mac shortcuts on by default. Getting to alt/option is a thumb-contortion, so I'll probably try out Cmd->Meta soon.
The only major keybinding change I've done so far (in 2 or 3 months of using Emacs on OS X) is Caps->Ctrl. Most of my work is done in python, and I just started using pymacs and ropemacs, which seem useful. I don't think shell-mode and zsh cooperate too well. Some prefer shell-mode, but I think ansi-term and zsh are more useful.
Text mode in aquamacs windows#
One of those windows is almost always running zsh inside ansi-term (M-x ansi-term). Sometimes I use three columns of windows, and other times four equal-sized windows makes sense.
Text mode in aquamacs full#
I have a large 1920x1200 display that I tend to use with one emacs frame maximized, and some arrangement of windows inside that frame - most often I have a full height window on the left, and two half-height windows on the right. I like having M-Q as fill-paragraph, and I found that other useful commands were being hijacked by useless OS X Text Services (like M-> for end of buffer got stolen by OmniOutliner) I absolutely override the Mac keybindings. I agree that the option key is no good as Meta - Cmd is Meta in my setup. There's something to be said for an emacs that feels like emacs :) I've tried all the various ports, and Aquamacs is my favorite 'native' port, but I actually miss the X11+gtk build I used before. I long used emacs in X11, but recently switched to Aquamacs out of sheer laziness - not wanting to recompile emacs+gtk for my new intel mac. I discovered both SBCL and Aquamacs when I wanted to learn Common Lisp, and Aquamacs coming with SLIME pre-installed made one less thing I had to fuss with. I like how Aquamacs tries to give you something that Just Works for most of what you want it to do, instead of something more bare bones that you are expected to configure out the wazoo. Going out and loading each mode you want one at a time and tweaking it just so seems so Linux to me. The other "Mac-like" thing about Aquamacs is how it pre-bundles so many of the useful modes. Probably because I have been using Macs in some capacity since 1987. I don't think I would ever get used to pressing cmd and not having it activate the Mac key bindings. I also agree that Option is the right key to use for Meta. Maybe it's just that, with Aquamacs, whatever key binding first pops into my head will probably work, so I don't have to worry about context switching so much. I also use Emacs in Windows and Unix at work, but I imagine it is sitting in front of my Mac that triggers the cmd key bindings in my head. when I use Mac cut/copy/paste, but I'm not sure what it is. There is probably some reason I sometimes use the Emacs kill/yank/etc. I seem to be the only one here who likes how Aquamacs uses both Mac and Emacs key bindings.
0 kommentar(er)
